We are pleased to announce that Hydrox is now officially vegan certified through the Vegan Awareness Foundation! After we acquired Hydrox in 2015, we rolled back the formula to get rid of the high fructose corn syrup, replacing it with REAL cane sugar. We also also eliminated all artificial flavors and GMOs in order to make Hydrox a “cleaner label”, non-GMO, and kosher. You can enjoy ‘America’s original sandwich cookie’, Hydrox, and know what’s in it. We’re kinda proud of that!
#madeintheusa #vegan #kosher #nongmo #theoriginalsandwichcookie
We know you’re frustrated that you can’t find Hydrox anywhere and here are the reasons why:
So, what are we doing to fix these issues?
As a child, the only sandwich cookie in Ellia Kassoff’s home was Hydrox. Not Oreos. Hydrox.
Decades later, the entrepreneur is resurrecting the product he used to love.
After years of dormancy, Hydrox cream-filled chocolate sandwich cookies are coming back. The cookies, which predate Oreo, could challenge its former rival and are available only via pre-order on Amazon.com.
Hydrox is scheduled for release Sept. 25. When they’ll appear in grocery stores is an open question. Kassoff said major national grocery chains have expressed interest.
“Nostalgia is powerful,” said Kassoff, chief executive of Leaf Brands, a Newport Beach candy company that manufactures Hydrox at its factory in Vernon. “I want to capture that experience people had as a kid … the happier times that people remember.”
Paul Castrovinci, 60, said he has fond childhood memories of eating Hydrox with a glass of cold milk, and promptly ordered six packages the day it was listed on Amazon.
“It was always my special treat to have Hydrox cookies before bedtime,” said Castrovinci, a Nashville resident. “It’s one of those old things you had as a kid, and they go away, and you wish they never went away.”
Hydrox debuted in 1908, originally manufactured by Sunshine Biscuits. In 1996, the Keebler Co. bought Sunshine and in 1999 changed the recipe and renamed the cookie Droxies, Kassoff said.
“They really just played with the product so much that it alienated the customer base,” he said.
In 2001, Kellogg’s acquired Keebler and Droxies soon was dropped. Other than a brief reappearance in 2008 for the cookie’s 100th anniversary, Hydrox has been absent from shelves.
Under federal law, a brand goes back into the public domain if it is not used for three years. Interested buyers can pay $275 to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to apply for the trademark. Last year, Kassoff snapped up the Hydrox trademark.
Kassoff has revived other old brands like the cone-shaped candy Astro Pops and the pencil eraser-shaped Tart n’ Tinys.
He’s not alone — a number of entrepreneurs have looked to past brands such as Turkish Taffy or Clearly Canadian sparkling water as potential moneymakers. But resurrecting brands can be tricky.
Nostalgia is powerful. I want to capture that experience people had as a kid … the happier times that people remember. – Ellia Kassoff, chief executive of Leaf Brands
“If a brand dies, something led it to die,” said Derek Rucker, professor of marketing at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. “There were probably associations that you and I as consumers didn’t like about the brand.”
Kassoff said it was sales and marketing decisions, not the product, that led to Hydrox’s demise.
“The misconception about resurrecting brands is, ‘Oh, these brands must have died because nobody wanted them anymore,'” he said. “In most cases, that isn’t true.”
The biggest challenge was finding the original recipe, before it was reformulated. Kassoff is tight-lipped about how he accomplished that: There are enough people in the cookie industry that could serve as consultants, he said, and the original vendors for Hydrox ingredients helped rebuild the recipe.
Kassoff set up a Facebook page for Hydrox cookies, and fans quickly started posting memories. Some of these fans also became taste testers for initial cookie samples.
“You have to make sure you have fan buy-in with a lot of these products,” Kassoff said. “If it’s not exactly the way they remember it, you’ll get one sale.”
Wendy Davie-Longnight of Eugene, Ore., said her father still has packages of cookies saved from the last time Hydrox was sold in stores. During holidays, the family held blind taste tests to see who could tell the difference between Hydrox and Oreo. Most got it right and said Hydrox was better.
“I’m sure I will be doing the exact same thing,” said Davie-Longnight, 50. “I will get Oreos and I will get Hydrox and I will make my children do the taste test.”
To take on the “powerhouse” Oreo, manufactured by Mondelez International Inc. of Deerfield, Ill., Hydrox will have to have a meaningful point of difference, Rucker said.
“Oreo is definitely a more engaged brand with the public,” he said. “What the best brands do is they become part of our lives, not just a badge of quality.”
Kassoff said Hydrox cookies are crispier, made of darker chocolate and have a less sugary filling with no high fructose corn syrup. He has also touted the cookie’s distinction of being made in the U.S. In July, Mondelez said it would invest more than $130 million in its Salinas, Mexico., production plant, which would assume the Oreo production responsibilities from a Chicago facility.
Company spokeswoman Kimberly Fontes said the Chicago plant will still operate and that Oreos will continue to be produced in several U.S. plants, including in New Jersey, Oregon and Virginia.
Kassoff said a new competitor for the chocolate sandwich cookie will only be positive.
“Hydrox is the one product that will keep Oreo in line,” he said.
samantha.masunaga@latimes.com
View full article here: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hydrox-20150925-story.html
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. — Leaf Brands L.L.C. officially relaunched Hydrox cookies on Sept. 4 with the onset of production at the company’s facility in Vernon, Calif. Leaf acquired the trademark for Hydrox sandwich cookies, Tart n Tinys, Wacky Wafers and Quicksand Bubblegum in May 2014.
Hydrox cookies debuted in 1908 and were manufactured by Sunshine Biscuits. Keebler purchased Sunshine Biscuits in 1996, and in 1999, Keebler replaced Hydrox with a similar but reformulated product named Droxies. buy domain name Keebler later was acquired by the Kellogg Co. in 2001. Kellogg removed Droxies from the market in 2003 and then revived Hydrox in 2008 in celebration of the cookie’s 100th anniversary. Distributed under the Sunshine label, Hydrox cookies shipped in late August 2008 with a slightly different recipe from the original. Less than a year later the products again were off the market.
After acquiring Hydrox last year, Leaf Brands said it set out to rebuild the cookies in their original formula, using sugar and high-quality cocoa.
Ellia Kassoff, c.e.o. of Leaf Brands.
“You will notice the ‘Other Guys’ use high-fructose corn syrup and other low quality ingredients because they’re all about increasing margins, even if that means moving to Mexico,” said Ellia Kassoff, chief executive officer of Leaf Brands. “We think it’s more important to sell an American-made product that only uses the best ingredients. That’s why we rolled back the formula to a recipe that doesn’t include any hydrogenated oils or HFCS, which were added to the cookie when Kellogg’s and Keebler owned it. The project took a while, but after a year of product development, we are extremely excited to start production.”
Leaf Brands said it has partnered with Amazon for the initial roll-out of Hydrox.
“There are many consumers waiting for the cookies as soon as they come off the line, and what better company to fulfill the initial influx of orders than Amazon,” Mr. Kassoff said.
Many of the major national and local supermarket and chain stores also will offer the cookies.
“The hardest part of bringing back such a well-known brand is managing the initial run on product and keeping up with production,” said Cody Sheean, vice-president of marketing and international sales for Leaf Brands. “We call it, ‘The Twinkie Effect,’ relating to the huge rush of consumers buying Twinkies after they were brought back a few years ago.”
At the time of its acquisition of the Hydrox trademark last March Leaf said its strategy was to rebuild one of the largest candy and snack companies in the United States, through acquisition and development of new and fun products for people to enjoy.
Article as seen in 'Advertising Age'
What happens when you put 600 candy marketers in a room with thousands of retail buyers? A sugar-filled pitch-a-thon where no packaging detail seems too small or sales stat too regional. "We dominate North Texas," Mike Sanderlin said at this week's Sweets & Snacks Expo in Chicago when asked about his cotton candy brand, called Cotton Candy A La' Cart. His pitch? Unlike other brands, it is packaged in transparent bags so "the kids can see it."
Like so many others, Mr. Sanderlin is looking to close deals at the three-day event, which is expected to draw some 15,000 people from across the globe. Buyers are seeking the next big thing in candy, while marketers large and small are hoping to fill orders as fast as they can. All the while, mascots like a walking Sour Patch Kid roam the exhibit hall, which is filled with enough free samples to induce a weeks-long sugar high. There is plenty of money to be made. The $33 billion confectionery industry continues to enjoy positive trends. Sales jumped 3.7% last year, according to the National Confectioners Association. And candy and snack makers have a 98% household-penetration rate, which puts it on par with toilet paper, said Leon Nicholas, senior VP-of retail insights for Kantar Retail, in a presentation Tuesday kicking off the show. Not everyone will succeed, of course, which is why marketers are hustling for shelf space in an industry that drew 765 new products last year, including 423 new chocolate items. Here is look at the good, the bad and the ugly at this year's show, which ends Thursday: Biggest trend: From Starburst "minis" to Twizzlers "bites," marketers continue to put classic brands in shrunken form, while stripping away individual wrappers in an appeal to on-the-go consumers. Hershey, meanwhile, is putting its chocolate in spreadable form with "Hershey's Spreads" set to debut in December Newest gum pitch: Wrigley in June will debut Orbit for Kids. The sugarfree gum comes in tot-friendly flavors like strawberry banana and has 15% Xylitol, which is said to be good for oral health. (Regular Orbit has less than 1% of Xylitol.) Will moms buy it? Gassiest candy: Farts Candy, by Leaf Brands, comes in Fruiti Farts, Sour Farts and Small Farts. CEO Ellia Kassoff described them as a chewy version of Nerds. And he swears the kids love them, because, well, they like to say the name. Fewest ingredients: Peeled Snacks' Much-Ado-About-Mango is a bag of organic mangos. That is it, nothing else. It is part of the company's "real-food philosophy," which has helped it gain distribution in Starbucks and Whole Foods. Sportiest sugar: Tennis star Maria Sharapova has a sweet tooth and now she has her own global candy brand. Her "Sugarpova" premium candy line hit stores last year in the U.S. and just debuted in Moscow. Varieties include gumballs that look like fuzzy tennis balls. Chocolate with the most jitters: A lot of chocolate candy already has natural caffeine, but not enough for the founders of Awake Chocolate, which boosted their bars with added caffeine. The bars debuted last year in Canada and just made their way into the U.S. One of the targets is, not surprisingly, college students. Most unlawful candy: Mexico's Grupo Turin makes chocolates filled with liquor, like Johnnie Walker and Baileys. In the U.S., it is only available in 16 states because of alcohol laws. Best investment: Dave Lefkow won $5,000 from "America's Funniest Home Videos," which he used as seed money for J&D's Foods with partner Justin Esch. Their marketing plan is simple, but genius: They have won free publicity on late-night TV shows with prank products like bacon condoms, while cranking out more mainstream items like the new Sriracha Popcorn, which was showcased at the show. Some of the fake products have actually turned turn into consumer hits, like bacon sex lube. "[We had] 5,000 people on a waiting list, so we made it," Mr. Lefkow said. "We are shameless," added Mr. Esch.
Article as seen in 'Snack and Bakery' http://www.snackandbakery.com/articles/87203-sweets-snacks-expo-2014-unveils-this-years-most-innovative-new-product-awards
RELEASE DATE: For Immediate Release “Pucker Up Baby, We’re Back!” LEAF Brands® Brings Back another Classic Candy, tart n' tinys® (Newport Beach, CA, February 19th, 2015) – Leaf Brands® LLC, the candy and snack manufacturer known for bringing back the iconic rocket pop, Astro Pops® has started shipping the classic candy tart n tinys®, which disappeared from candy store shelves some 10 years ago when it was manufactured under the Wonka® brand name. After opening up pre-sales exclusively to tart n' tinys® fervent Facebook followers in December, the company reported selling out of product in just 3 days. “We were amazed at the sheer number of loyal fans that bombarded us with order requests,” Says Ellia Kassoff CEO of Leaf Brands®. “As soon as we announced both bulk and 1.5oz single serve packaged tart n' tinys® were in stock, they were gone. People are still buying 2-3 display boxes at a time!” Tart n’ tinys® were the best little candies to pop in your mouth back in the 1970's through the 2000's. After being reformulated, changed, and finally discontinued, the legacy was carried on by tart n' tinys® fans, begging for the iconic candy to be brought back and in its original form. In 2013, Leaf Brands® announced it was planning on re-launching this classic candy and began receiving many calls and emails each day asking when they would be available. “We knew we had a hot brand on our hands based on the daily requests. We even had one person tell us they would dance on their desk with packages in their hand on video when we started shipping.” Leaf Brand’s® tart n' tinys® are exactly like the original; (uncoated and full of flavors) plus an added new flavor; Blue Raspberry. Tart n' tinys® fans were very particular about Leaf Brands® keeping the original mouth feel of the uncoated little candies, plus, Leaf kept their iconic "stackability" too! Stack them up and toss them in your mouth! The tart n' tinys® re-launch was officially revealed at the Sweets and Snacks expo, in 2014, where Leaf gave out samples and made final adjustments before its full rollout in December. It took over a year and a half to develop the product all the fans would buy and right now 100% of consumers tell us we, ”hit our mark” making them exactly as they remember.” Extensive use of surveys and interaction with fans from the tart n’ tinys® Facebook page made it all possible says Kassoff. “We always include the “die-hard” fans when we bring back all our iconic products, since they know them better than anyone in the world!” tart n' tinys® are now available in 15 lbs. mixed bulk and in 1.5oz single serve bags, which come 24 to a display and 6 displays to a master case. Purchase through First Source®, Leaf Brand’s® official master distributor or through your regional distributors. ### About LEAF Brands®, LLC: The original LEAF Brands® was started in the 1920's. LEAF Brands, once the fourth largest candy producer in North America, produced candy classics such as Whoppers®, Jolly Rancher® and Rain Blo Bubblegum®, which were later sold to Hershey® Chocolate & Confectionary Corporation in the late 1990's. Family members have acquired the LEAF brand name for the US, and assembled together to revive the LEAF name and its famous image. Products include Astro Pops®, tart n’ tinys®, Farts® Candy and David’s Signature Beyond Gourmet™ products. For additional information, contact: Cody Sheean www.leafbrands.com csheean@leafbrands.com (949) 424-1664
Hydrox was on Better Call Saul, the Breaking Bad prequel! Check out AMC's Twitter feed [embed]http://youtu.be/T2R3xWcMS6E[/embed] Sweden . ip info buy domain name
(Article as appears in USA Today) The Oreo-buster is back. Hydrox™ cookies, those Oreo-like chocolate sandwich cookies, could reappear on store shelves as early as September, says Ellia Kassoff, CEO of Leaf Brands, which recently acquired the rights to the unused Hydrox™ trademark. "The cosmic difference between Hydrox™ and Oreo is that Hydrox™ is a little more crispy; a little less sugary and stands up better in milk," says Kassoff, who will make the official announcement later this month at the Sweets & Snacks Expo in Chicago on May 20. Even in a new world of nutritional consciousness, there is little evidence that America's sweet tooth is fading. Sales of packaged cookies and baked goods are expected to top $17 billion by 2017 -- up from $13 billion in 2012, reports Packaged Facts. internet use statistics . While the return of Hydrox™ is expected to be a hit with Baby Boomers who may fondly remember the brand -- formerly owned by Kellogg's, Keebler and Sunshine -- it may be a tougher sell with Millennials who are not very familiar with the cookie brand, which hasn't been regularly sold on store shelves in almost a decade. "We'll use social media to reach out to Millennials," says Kassoff. The 46-year-old CEO says that he likes to acquire old brands or trademarks that still have fans. "We recycle brands that get left on the side of the road." But the Hydrox™ brand has special meaning to him. As a young kid raised by parents who were Orthodox Jews, he was only permitted to eat Hydrox™ -- not Oreos -- because, he says, at the time, Oreos were not kosher but Hydrox™ were. Today, both are kosher. The move by Leaf Brands -- which also owns trademarks to Astro Pops, Wacky Wafers and Farts Candy -- comes just two years after giant Oreo celebrated its 100th birthday. Little-known, however, is that Hydrox™ was the original creme-filled chocolate sandwich cookie when it debuted in 1908 -- followed four years later by Oreo. But executives at Mondelez, which owns the Oreo brand, are hardly showing any signs of concern. "Oreo is America's favorite cookie," says Laurie Guzzinati, a company spokeswoman. She declined to comment specifically on the return of Hydrox™. Oreo sales, which exceed $2 billion globally and $1 billion in North America, have grown double-digits in the U.S. for the past two years. Its been years since Oreo had a genuine rival on the shelf. Kellogg stopped making Hydrox™ in 2002. Then, in 2008, when Hydrox™ turned 100, Kellogg briefly resumed distribution, but only for a limited time. Hydrox™ still has an online fan page, and a few months ago, Bill Burnett, of Salina, Okla., posted this wishful note about Hydrox™: "My brother and I loved them. I never got a taste for the inferior "Oreo," which was far less tasty as the wonderful Hydrox™. I think I've only bought one package of them in 50 years! Bring Hydrox™ back again!" In fact, says Kassoff, it's fans like Burnett who convinced him to bring back the brand. "I hear from all of them," he says. "I know millions of people are waiting for the product." But unlike the cookies giants, which typically must sell at least $100 million worth of a brand for it to be an even modest success, Burnett says he can sell a fraction of that and do just fine. The pricing will be roughly where Hydrox™ was for years: less expensive than Oreos but more expensive than store brands. If a 14-ounce package of Oreos retails for about $4; Hydrox™ will be $3 and store brand sandwich cremes often cost about $2, he says. But success won't come simply. At least one brand guru says Hydrox™ has lots of work to do. "Oreo conveys round and is fun to say and hear.Hydrox™ sounds scientific and medicinal ... not appetizing at all," says Steven Addis, CEO of Addis. "Oreo has become part of the fabric of America. Like Coke. This makes it somewhat unassailable, even from a superior product." The cookies will be made at a factory in Southern California, but Kassoff won't say where. Maybe he doesn't want the fans lining up outside the gates just yet. But later this summer, when the first pack rolls of the line, Kassoff has big plans for that one. "It's mine," he says. "I'm going to sit down and share it with my family."
Article as seen in "BEVNET"
NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. — LEAF® Brands LLC, announces new ‘Zero Calorie’ versions of their popular Astro Pop® sodas. The candy and snack manufacturer gained attention last month at the Sweets and Snacks Expo in Chicago when their Farts® Candy won the award for “Most Innovative New Product 2014’’. Now LEAF® continues their innovations with a new 100% naturally sweetened ‘zero calorie’ line extension of their popular sodas.
LEAF Brands® elevated their retro candy Astro Pops® to a whole new level when they announced in 2011, they would release a line of Astro Pop® sodas using real cane sugar in glass bottles, using the exact flavors of their popular Astro Pop® lollipop. The line of sodas then sold out shortly after their release. Ellia Kassoff, LEAF’s CEO remarked; ‘’The sodas really taste like you’re drinking your favorite candy, Astro Pop®! ‘‘They’re perfect for mixing and matching to create the entire Astro Pop® candy experience!’’ Since its release in 2011, sales of Astro Pop® sodas have exceeded company expectations. Following the success of their cane sugar-sweetened version of its sodas, LEAF® launched three additional varieties; ‘Zero Calorie’ Pineapple, ‘Zero Calorie’ Passion Fruit, and ‘Zero Calorie’ Cherry’ in response to a growing demand for naturally sweetened, zero-calorie products in the beverage category.
The Astro Pop® ‘Zero Calorie’ sodas are made with LEAF® Brand’s proprietary, all natural sugar-free blend called ‘Ultrasweet™’. ‘’We created Ultrasweet™ since there wasn’t a natural sugar substitute on the market which didn’t leave a strange taste in one’s mouth,’’ LEAF CEO, Ellia Kassoff stated, ‘’We also wanted to create a sweetener which is 100% naturally derived without the GMO’s found in other natural sweeteners.’’ The sodas are sold in Rocket Fizz and other specialty stores nationwide, with later availability in larger retailers by year-end. “We’re really excited to start experimenting with different flavors as well’’ Kassoff suggested, ‘’With as many Astro Pop® variations we can make, the possibilities for our sodas are endless’’. Astro Pop® sodas are currently sold in 12-ounce glass bottles with a suggested retail price of $1.69.
LEAF Brands has also been garnished attention all over the country for their rebuilding of retro brands. Look for Hydrox Cookies™, the original sandwich cookie, as well as Tart n Tinys™, Bonkers! ™ Fruit Chews, and Wacky Wafers™ to reach retail stores by late 2014. LEAF’S strategy is to rebuild one of the largest candy and snack companies in the US, through brand acquisition and development of new and fun products for consumers to enjoy. LEAF focusses on resurrecting many old brands in their original form, and then expands the product lines once the products are re-launched.
About Leaf® Brands, LLC
The original LEAF® Brands was started in the 1920’s. LEAF Brands, once the fourth largest candy producer in North America, produced candy classics such as Whoppers®, Jolly Rancher® and Rain Blo Bubblegum®, which were later sold to Hershey® Chocolate & Confectionary Corporation in the late 1990’s. Family members have acquired the LEAF brand name for the US, and assembled together to revive the Leaf name and its famous image. Products include Astro Pops®, Yummers!™, Farts Candy™ and David’s Signature Beyond Gourmet™ products.
Article as seen in 'The Wall Street Journal' http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303513404577352082845116146
Get ready for the return of Astro Pops, Boast logo shirts, National Premium beer and the Seafood Shanty restaurant chain, all names that had avid followings in their time. The difficult economy is prompting many entrepreneurs to try to revive old brands from the dead, or the near-dead.
The problem is that tastes have changed in the meantime. But that hasn't stopped Eddie Riegel of Exeter Township, Pa. The owner of a Reading, Pa., cleaning company has invested $1 million of his personal savings and a government-backed small-business loan in his bid to revive the old Seafood Shanty chain. The restaurants, first launched in 1970, had 14 locations in Pennsylvania and New Jersey by the 1980s and were known for clam chowder and Key lime pie. But founder Joseph C. Gentile lost his small seafood empire after falling into debt by the 1990s. He was later charged with failure to pay taxes, including payroll taxes. (He couldn't be reached for comment.) Mr. Riegel, who took his wife to a Seafood Shanty on their first date in 1982, acquired the trademark for the brand in 2010 after asking his lawyer to find out whether the rights to the mark had expired. microsoft server He bought the original recipes for $7,500 after tracking down the former chef on Facebook. He says he also got some fishing nets and other original decor from former Seafood Shanty workers.
In February, Mr. Riegel opened the first new Seafood Shanty restaurant in Spring Ridge, Pa., not far from the chain's former headquarters. As early as November, he says, while crews were still putting up the drywall, about 200 people had lined up outside for prelaunch gift cards. While he's kept much of the original concept, 19 of the 85 employees used to work for the chain, including the manager,he has added a raw bar and a seafood market at the flagship location. "There's a tremendous amount of buzz around this," he says. "Anyone who grew up in the area remembers these restaurants." Using an old brand or product gives entrepreneurs at least one important advantage over start-ups: The amount they have to spend on marketing is often less than the cost of creating a new brand or concept, says George T. Haley, who teaches marketing at the University of New Haven's College of Business.
If a trademarked brand hasn't been used for three or more consecutive years, the law presumes it has been abandoned and it becomes available for others to register and use, according to Lawrence J. Siskind, a founding partner at the law firm Harvey Siskind LLP in San Francisco who specializes in intellectual-property law. Other entrepreneurs say they are actively seeking the owners of old products and concepts that may have fallen by the wayside in order to buy the rights. "It's pretty much open season for older brands," says Garland Pollard, a former travel writer from Sarasota, Fla., who started BrandlandUSA, a Web site for posts about classic American brands, five years ago. A year ago, Mr. Pollard added classified ads to the site, enabling people to buy and sell old brands. The site itself gets 17,000 visits a month, he says, while the classified-ad page is getting about 400 visits a month, up from 200 at the start of the year. "Because something is discontinued doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad product," says entrepreneur Ellia Kassoff of Newport Coast, Calif. "Maybe it just didn't fit the business model of the company at the time." The 43-year-old Mr. Kassoff, who owns an executive recruiting firm, noticed a few years ago that a local cash-and-carry chain was no longer carrying Astro Pops, the rocket-shaped lollipop he used to buy as a kid. He says he called the pops' owner, Spangler Candy of Bryan, Ohio, in 2010 and was told that Astro Pops had been discontinued in 2004.
He agreed to pay cash up front for global rights to the trademark and recipes as well as three years of royalty payments. He then figured out how to make the product in China in a way that would let him replicate the pops' look and taste. hosting information He plans to launch the pops at Dylan's Candy Bar in New York next month. Tim Miller of Easton, Md., paid $1,200 for the National Premium beer trademark at a December 2010 auction. Launched in the 1930s, the brand, familiar to generations of Baltimore Orioles fans, disappeared in the mid-1990s after then-owner Stroh Brewing Co. ceased production amid weak sales. "It was just too good to be true for a native Marylander to see a brand like that available," says Mr. Miller, a realtor, who spent the first six months of 2011 tracking down the beer's original recipe. He has since lined up two distributors and hopes to start selling the beer later this year. John Dowling of New York City first saw Boast polo shirts at a tennis camp in the 1980s. The shirts, a preppy icon, were launched in Greenwich, Conn., in 1972 by All-American squash and tennis player Bill St. buy domain name John. "Everyone was wearing Lacoste, but the cool camp counselors were wearing Boast," says Mr. Dowling, a former New York University film student who worked in advertising.
The logo had vanished from mainstream clothing stores by the early 1990s, although Boast shirts were still available at tennis and country clubs. Two years ago, Mr. Dowling, 40 years old, and a partner, both avid tennis and squash players, struck a deal with Mr. relevant domains St. John to buy the brand's trademark logo, a tiny Japanese maple leaf that is often mistaken for marijuana. They paid more than $1 million, according to Mr. St. John, though the buyers dispute that. Under the deal, Mr. St. John got a 32% share of Branded Boast, a spinoff company that would sell the clothing line in the U.S. Mr. St. John also continues to run Boast Inc., which sells a private-label line without the logo at sports and country clubs in the U.S. and overseas. Mr. Dowling launched the revived clothing line in September 2010 with financing from an angel investing round. The new line updates the 1980s look with a slimmer, contemporary cut. At a New York City trade show in January 2011, he says, "People came by the booth and were like 'Holy cow! Is that Boast?'" The first run of 8,000 shirts had sold out, with about 90% of sales online. Mr. Dowling is adding shorts, tennis dresses and accessories that used to be features of the brand. Mr. St. John, now 63, says having fans of the past isn't enough, though. "There are all those youngsters out there now [who] need to be turned on to it."